The Abuse Of Plea Bargain In Nigeria

Lucky Igbinedion in court for corruption
By Peter Odia, Esq

One of the most common and controversial recent practices in the criminal justice process is plea-bargaining. A plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecutor and the accused person in a criminal trial.

The prosecutor will give the accused person the opportunity to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to the original charge with lighter sentence. Although plea bargain has become a global means of achieving results in prosecuting criminal offences, most countries including Nigeria have refused to codify it or create a legal frame work for its use and thus has led to various abuses. An example is the case of Chief Lucky Nosakhare Igbinedion.

 In 2008, the former governor of Edo State from 1999 – 2007, Chief Lucky Nosakhare Igbinedion was arraigned by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) before the Federal High Court, Enugu in charge No FHC/EN/6C/2008 on a 191- count charge of corruption, money laundering and embezzlement of N2.9b. In a plea bargain arrangement, the EFCC through its counsel Mr. Rotimi Jacob reduced the 191- count charge to one - count charge. The single charge reads:

“That you, Lucky Igbinedion (former Governor of Edo State) on or about January 21, 2008 within the Jurisdiction of this honourable court neglected to make a declaration of your interest in account No. 41240113983110 with GTB in the declaration of assets form of the EFCC and you thereby committed an offence punishable under section 27 (3) of the EFCC Act 2004”

The terms of the plea bargain were that the prosecutor would reduce the 191 - count charge to one - count charge and in return, Lucky Igbinedion will refund N500m, 3 properties and plead guilty to the one - count charge.

In line with the plea bargain, on the 18th December 2008, the court presided over by Justice A. Abdul Kafarati convicted Lucky Igbinedion on the one- count charge and ordered him to refund N500m, forfeit 3 houses and sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment or pay N3.6m as option of fine. There was a general outcry and disappointment by Nigerians over the judgment, which made the chairperson of the anti-corruption agency, Mrs. Farida Waziri to issue a statement that the plea bargain duly entered into fell short of its expectation. Accordingly, on 19-12-2008 the commission appealed the decision of the court, though nothing has since been
heard of the appeal. It is important to point out that the appeal filed by the commission is not in respect of the whole judgment but only a part of the decision of the judge for giving option of fine to Lucky Igbinedion. That is to say, the commission is comfortable with the terms of the plea bargain judgement save for the option of fine.
Again, on 18-2-2011 the commission filed a fresh 66- count charge of corruption and money laundering against Lucky Igbinedion and others at the Federal High Court, Benin City in Charge No FHC/B/HC/2011. He was accused of embezzling 25billion Naira from the coffers of the Edo State people when he was their Governor. But on 31-5-2011, delivering ruling on a preliminary objection filed by Igbinedion’s Counsel, the presiding judge, Justice Adamu Hosbon held that it would amount to double jeopardy and abuse of court process to try the former governor again as he had in 2008 entered into a plea bargain with the commission at the Federal High Court Enugu. Accordingly, Igbinedion’s name was struck out from the 66- count charge. The commission’s denial that there was no agreement with Lucky Igbinedion could not avail them.

The case of Lucky Igbinedion has opened the eyes of Nigerians to many puzzles on plea bargain as practiced by the EFCC. Among the puzzles are (i) was it a good bargain for the commission to compress and reduce 191 - count charge to one - count charge?, (ii) was it a good bargain for the commission to accept N500m and 3 houses and allow Lucky Igbinedion to keep N2.4b and other properties?, (iii) was the option of fine a part of the plea bargain or it was imported into the judgment by the presiding judge?, (iv) was it a good bargain for the commission to charge Lucky Igbinedion on a mere non-disclosure of an account with GTB when among the 191- count charges there were weightier and more serious count charges on corruption and embezzlement?, (v) was it a good bargain to enter into an oral agreement with Lucky Igbinedion in the circumstances of the case? (vi) was it a good bargain to let Lucky Igbinedion off the hook on a N2.9b fraud with an understanding not to prosecute him again when there was a N25b fraud pending against him?

As mind-boggling as these questions maybe, the answers may forever be elusive because the whole concept of plea bargain as pictured by Igbinedion’s case is rooted in terrible legal advice, inefficiency, secrecy, and stinks of underhand dealings. It is also disturbing that simply because the commission needed to assuage the feelings of Nigerians, it had to use the tax payers money to appeal such a judgment based on a plea bargain which they entered with their clean - eyes. The same taxpayers money was equally used to file another matter in Benin when the commission knew it had sealed a bargain, no matter how bizarre, with Lucky Igbinedion on the same matter. At the end, because nobody accepts responsibility for mistakes in Nigeria, the commission and its lawyers smile to the bank while Nigerians who have been short- changed continue to groan in poverty.
 
In Nigeria, for a plea bargain to be effective, there should be a Legislation that will create a legal frame work to ensure that whoever will be appointed as prosecutor for a particular case, must have the technical knowledge of every element of the offence, a sound understanding of the likely evidence to be adduced, a reasonable understanding of the Law and the interest of the State. There should also be a check on the powers of the prosecutor to negotiate a plea bargain by resorting to the Attorney General if charges are being dismissed, discounted or the accused is being promised no further prosecution.

Thank you.

Peter Odia, Esq
National Co-ordinator,
Human Rights & Accountability Initiative - HURAIN

Comments
5 comment(s)
Post a comment

The blog on the Abuse of Plea

The blog on the Abuse of Plea Bargain in Nigeria is one of the relevant topics that are trending now. Nigeria is a country where a lot of this happens regularly and it is a topic that has a humanitarian attention from all over the world. Windows 8 drivers

IWE LOVE PLEA BARGAIN

Please do not talk against plea bargain because even if you are a lawyer you have no experience.
The police and EFCC careless about the Rules of Evidence.
I know that as the wife of an Oba I am not surposed to talk or write in this type of enviroinment but I cannot help but tell you that plea bargain is part of law. EFCC and police rush to newspapers and courts without concrete evidence. Without PB everybody will be free.
In court they will be required to prove that a deffendant is guilty. In Nigeria, Hearsay is the only Evidence that the police and EFCC have. The court is not SR where everybody can say what they like.

The so called Plea-bargain is

The so called Plea-bargain is nothing short criminal act against the state by the justice system. This act mostly practiced in the capitalist countries is why their economy is retrogressing. China that serves stiff penalty on corrupt officials is now leading the world!

plea bargain

the essence of plea bargain is not to reduce the offense, but to ensure that justice is done, albeit little. A plea bargain should only be entered when the prosecutor is lacking in evidence and feels they might loss the court case or if through the plea bargain a nigger criminal is apprehended and given the full weight of the law. all the plea bargains entered in Nigeria are riddled with fraud and as such is not justice at all. there were lots of evidence against lucky so the commission did not need a plea bargain (he might have needed one) so they need to explain to us, what they stood to gain by entering such a bizarre agreement. lucky is 'legally spending taxpayers 25 billion'. i simply just hate this country......and EFCC

Balogun, Alamie, and now Bankole!

Walai, plea bargain na euphemism for settlement of ALL concerned with loot!

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comments are limited to a maximum of 1000 characters.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <p> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.