A coalition of Civil Society Organisations has urged the Nigerian President, Bola Tinubu to find a lasting solution to age-long controversies that always trail the appointment of the Inspector- General of Police (IGP).
This was contained in a press statement released by the groups on Friday, detailing how previous governments were guilty of disregarding the true position of the law while appointing the Nigerian police boss.
The release was signed by Okechukwu Nwanguma for the Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre (RULAAC), Olukayode Senbanjo of the Confluence of Rights, Nigeria; Lawyers, Samuel Ihensekhien, and others
The statement reads: “Appointment of Inspectors-General of the Nigeria Police under successive administrations have often triggered avoidable controversies that have been allowed to fester over the years, now crying for the immediate attention of, and resolution by, Mr. President, as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, and more specifically, as Chairman of the Police Counsel.
“The appointment by former President Muhammadu Buhari of Mr. Usman Alkali Baba as the Acting Inspector General of Police in April 2021 following his sudden removal of Mr. Muhammed Adamu (Baba's predecessor), while he was on an official assignment in Owerri, Imo State expectedly stoked the unending controversy on the contradictions between the De Jure and the De facto procedure on the appointment of the Inspector General of Police for Nigeria.
“Baba replaced Adamu who was Inspector General of Police from 15 January 2019 to February 1, 2021 when he was due and expected to retire before Buhari extended his tenure by three months. He was suddenly removed on April 6, 2021 and replaced by Baba.
“The controversy surrounding Baba's appointment bordered on a number of issues. The first was about the way Adamu was removed while on national assignment which many considered untidy. Baba's appointment was also considered as nepotistic and brought back debates over Buhari’s history of appointments which always skewed heavily in favour of Northern Muslims in a multicultural and pluralistic society much against the letter and spirit of Nigeria’s Federal Character, a Constitutional imperative. The appointment was also considered a gross violation of the extant provisions of the Police Act 2020.
“The Nigeria Police Force (Establishment) Act, 2020 which came into force on the 17th of September 2020, repealed the colonial 1943 Police Act. Tenure and Legal limits on age and years of service for the IGP – the Police Act 2020 prescribes a four-year term of office and retirement age of 60 or 35 years in service whichever is earlier. This is in line with the civil service rules which the Police Act makes reference to. With regards to age, Section 18, paragraph 8, says that every police officer shall, on recruitment or appointment, serve in the Nigeria Police Force for a period of 35 years or until he attains the age of 60, whichever is earlier.
“As at the date of his appointment, Usman Baba was 58 years old and following the rules should have retired in two year’s time while he was stepping into an office with a four-year tenure.
“The controversy over Baba's tenure as IGP resurrected two years later when it was expected that he had attained the maximum number of years of service stipulated by the Civil service rules, and therefore should go. This renewed controversy followed the announcement by the then Minister of Police Affairs, Mohammed Dingyadi that the IGP will not be retiring when he turns 60 on March 1, 2023.
“In appointing Baba, or extending his tenure - as with previous similar appointments or extensions, there was no evidence that President Buhari sought the concurrence of the Police Council as is required by both the Constitution and the Police Act.
“Section 7 of the Police Act, paragraph 2 says that the person to be appointed as Inspector General of Police shall be a senior police officer not below the rank of an Assistant Inspector-General of Police. In addition, Section 7 paragraph 6 of the Police Act also states that the person to be appointed to the office of the Inspector-General of Police shall hold office for four years.”
The groups added that the Police Act 2020 states that the Inspector General of Police should be appointed by the President on the advice of the Police Council from among serving members of the Police Force.
The statement continued: “The newly sworn in President, Bola Tinubu must avoid the wrongful, patently illegal and unconstitutional steps of the past Buhari regime which led to controversies and judicial challenge of appointments made by the President.
“The judicial challenge of Baba's appointment and the recent ruling by a High Court in Anambra State nullifying that appointment are a national embarrassment, to say the least.
“The penchant of some past presidents to irregularly promote a preferred Commissioner of Police to the rank of AIG for the sole purpose of making such an officer qualified for appointment, with the collateral consequence of forcing the premature retirement of all his senior officers must stop. Those mainly affected by this wrong-headed practice are usually AIGs and DIGs who can no longer remain in office because they are seniors to the candidate so handpicked and appointed by the President. This is unfair to the affected senior officers who are forced to retire before their due dates. It is also a waste of manpower and the national and international resources invested in training them. These are besides the destructive loss of institutional memory, a critical asset that provides foundational stability.
“In appointing a new IGP to replace Baba, President Tinubu should avoid a repeat of the pitfalls, errors and brazen illegalities of the past.
“The President should take due cognizance of the provisions of the Police Act 2020 regarding 4-year-tenure. He should appoint only candidates who have up to four years and above in service. Appointment must be made in consultation with the Police Council as stipulated by both the Police Act and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999. The President should also ensure geopolitical balancing and equity in line with the constitutional Federal Character Principle.
“In short, appointments must be based on legal and constitutional stipulations, merit, competence, qualifications, seniority and existing line of succession. The highest considerations must be professional and managerial competence rather than partisan or personal political preferences or nepotistic or other mundane considerations.
“We offer this advice to help this new administration chart a refreshingly new course, which, to us, is at tandem with the President’s commitment to rule of law and the undertaking he publicly gave in his inauguration address on May 29, 2023.”