Skip to main content

Presidential Election Tribunal Adjourns Atiku Abubakar’s Petition Against Tinubu

FILE
May 9, 2023

The PDP and Atiku in the petition marked CA/PEPC/05/2023, are challenging the declaration of Tinubu as the winner of the February 25th Presidential election by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
 

 

The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Abuja on Tuesday adjourned the continuation of the pre-hearing of the petition by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, against the “President-elect”, Bola Tinubu of the ruling All Progressive Congress (APC) to Thursday May 11, 2023.
The PDP and Atiku in the petition marked CA/PEPC/05/2023, are challenging the declaration of Tinubu as the winner of the February 25th Presidential election by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
The petitioners listed INEC, Tinubu and the APC as 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents respectively.
The counsel for the petitioners, Chris Uche (SAN), at Tuesday’s proceedings informed the court that they had filed and served a motion dated 7th May requesting a live broadcast of the presidential tribunal proceeding.
Uche noted that the application was a motion of priority which requires immediate attention given the national importance of the issue at hand, PUNCH reports.
“We urge your Lordship to set it down for hearing and adoption as soon as the court’s business may allow,” he said.
The counsel for INEC, A.B Mahmoud, in his response acknowledged the application which he described as “innocuous” and requested time to respond “being served yesterday.”
Similarly, the counsel for the 2nd respondent, Lateef Fagbemi, told the court that they received the application and “we are taking steps to respond appropriately to the application.”
The counsel to the petitioners further argued that he was just hearing that the 2nd and 3rd respondents have filed on the matter adding that in the spirit of cooperation, they are prepared to accept service in the open court.
He said, “We pray that the parties don’t insist on the maximum length of time if we are to make progress.”
But Fagbemi, counsel to the 2nd respondent, objected to Uche’s claim saying that “The motion was filed by 9:30am and not in the open court. If he said counsels should cooperate, we will follow the time and we will not flout the rules.”
The Chairman of the tribunal, Justice Tsammani, thereafter asked parties to the petition to settle all issues for objections and determination, saying that the application for a live broadcast of the proceeding “will be considered together with the other issues.”
The judge then adjourned the pre-hearing of the petition to Thursday May 11, 2023, by 2pm.