One of his legal representatives, Mrs Lilian Arukwe told SaharaReporters that they filed Charles' bail application at the High Court.
The Awgu Division High Court of Enugu State has fixed Tuesday, March 26 to hear the bail application of detained activist, Charles Arukwe, who was remanded in prison custody on trumped up charge of alleged forgery after exposing police extortion.
One of his legal representatives, Mrs Lilian Arukwe told SaharaReporters that they filed Charles' bail application at the High Court.
"Graciously, Justice Ngozi Oji has fixed tomorrow, March 26 to hear the bail application. We are hopeful that the court will grant him bail tomorrow," she noted.
SaharaReporters reported on March 19, how the Enugu State Police Command arrested, brutalised, arraigned Arukwe and remanded him in prison custody after accusing him of forging motorcycle sale agreement.
A police source had told SaharaReporters that Arukwe was arrested following his consistent petitions against the operatives attached to the Awgu police station over unbridled extortion of residents over the years.
In a three-count charge marked MGB/13c/2023, which SaharaReporters obtained, the police accused Arukwe of forgery of a motorcycle sale agreement.
The charge had been brought first before a Senior Magistrate, Jude Umezulike on January 8, 2023, and he rejected it for lack of evidence to support the charge.
However, a new Magistrate came, and the police brought the charge up again before Magistrate, P.U Igwiloh, who now remanded the activist in custody on Friday, March 15, 2024.
The charge had the Commissioner of Police as the complainant and Ekene Charles Arukwe as the accused.
Mr Fidelis Onuma, who prepared the sale agreement had told SaharaReporters that the charge was a pure police witch-hunt against Arukwe for being a stumbling block on their extortions.
Onuma said: "Actually that document was not forged; that is the mistake police make sometimes. I also visited the police station and made a statement that the document was not forged; it was my seal that was fixed in that document and I signed it myself, so where do you talk about forgery here?
"What the DCO (Divisional Crime Officer) told me was that the woman that sold the motorcycle to Arukwe didn't sign as at the date the document was purported to have been written. But that should be an arrangement between the purchaser and the seller, it can be signed at any moment. The woman was saying that she signed the document sometime in April while the document was prepared in September the previous year.
"I told the police that we reached out to the woman but her phone wasn't connecting because I ought to have seen the seller before preparing the document since she was not available to personally come to my office but I requested the original copy of the receipt of purchase of the motorcycle and I saw it.
"The original copies of the purchase of the motorcycle were given to Arukwe who was brought to me by the woman. So based on the original documents given to him by the woman that I prepared the agreement. So after the agreement document had been prepared we reached out to the woman but she wasn't available. I was told that she is an Evangelist and always out of the town. I said ok, take it to her, let her take it to her lawyer to explain to her the content of the agreement before she could sign.
"Arukwe left I didn't see him again till I was called at the police station that the document was forged. You can't talk about forgery when I own up to the content of the document and I am the maker with my stamp and seal on it. Assuming Arukwe had signed the woman's signature you can talk about the forgery of her signature but the woman admitted to having signed the document but she signed on a different date. We are not talking about stolen property here. Nobody complained that the motorcycle was stolen. The fact is a forgery, so how do you establish forgery - you bring the original writeup or signature and juxtapose it with the supposed forged writeup or signature.
"But in this case, the woman owned up and said I signed my signature but it wasn't at the time Arukwe was saying I signed that I signed. So, where is the forgery? Arukwe said that the woman signed before her husband as a witness and the husband also confirmed it. It calls for evidence and definitely I will testify in the case."
He added, "So, it has been a recurrent decimal on the side of the Awgu Divisional Police for many years with Arukwe of which I have been handling his matter sometimes. It is a pure case of witch-hunt because Arukwe has been denying them access to all the N20,000 or N5,000 they collect as bail, so they are not happy with him. This charge is simply a trumped-up charge to get at Arukwe."